Prince William and Kate bring 3 kids to 2026 Easter service: which royals were there

Show summary Hide summary

The royal family gathered at Windsor on Easter Sunday in a scene of tradition and restraint, with King Charles III and Queen Camilla leading a measured procession into St George’s Chapel. The public service brought smiles and formal attire, but the day also exposed fissures in the extended family, as some members stayed away amid lingering controversies.

Who attended the Easter Mattins service at St George’s Chapel

Leading the procession were King Charles III and Queen Camilla, arriving in classic Sunday formality. Close behind came the Wales family: Prince William, Princess Kate and their three children.

  • King Charles III — navy pinstripe suit
  • Queen Camilla — red dress and matching hat
  • Prince William, Princess Kate and their children: Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis
  • Princess Anne and Sir Tim Laurence
  • Prince Edward and his son James

The appearance marked a public return for the Wales family, who had skipped the event in recent years. The procession unfolded under steady daylight, with many well-wishers watching the walk into the chapel.

Style notes: what the royals wore and family coordination

Fashion on the day echoed royal understatement. The Wales men favored coordinated navy suits, while the women chose muted, polished looks.

  • Kate Middleton and Princess Charlotte were seen in similar beige coatdresses.
  • William and his sons wore matching navy ensembles.
  • Kate accessorized with a coordinating fascinator and a tan DeMellier handbag.

The outfits underscored a traditional family image, carefully composed for public view.

Notable absences and the shadow of past controversies

Several senior royals were not present. Most conspicuous was the absence of Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie. Their missing presence drew attention given the wider context involving their father, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

Timeline of developments tied to Andrew

  1. In October 2025, the king removed certain royal honours from his younger brother.
  2. Months later, in February, Andrew was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office.

Those events reverberated through the family, and media outlets had reported in the days before Easter that Andrew’s daughters would not attend the public church service.

How the palace reacted and what the monarch said

At the time of Andrew’s arrest, the monarch issued a measured statement expressing concern and urging that official inquiries proceed without interference. He stressed that the family would cooperate with the appropriate authorities and continue their public duties.

King Charles III emphasized support for an impartial process and reminded the public that the law must be allowed to run its course.

How this Easter compared with last year’s arrangements

Last year’s Easter looked different. The family dynamics then included Andrew and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, at the service. The Wales family chose a private approach that holiday, attending a separate church service in Sandringham with Kate’s parents, Michael and Carole Middleton.

  • The Wales family left via a back entrance to avoid royal watchers.
  • Kate had announced her cancer was in remission in January 2025.
  • William and Kate cited family time with their children before school as a reason for stepping back that year.

Palace whispers and public reaction to the Wales family’s choices

Insiders and palace observers have tracked the choices of senior royals closely. Some aides framed the Wales family’s past absences as understandable when health concerns were involved. Others read repeated nonattendance as a deliberate shift.

Those close to the family described a mix of sympathy and scrutiny inside royal circles. The debate ranges from a practical desire for private family time to questions about the optics of stepping away from longstanding traditions.

What the day signaled about royal routine and public duty

The Easter Mattins outing remained a litmus test for public continuity. For many, the event reaffirmed the monarchy’s ritual calendar. For others, it exposed unresolved tensions that continue to shape public perception.

As the service concluded, the mix of presence and absence underscored how personal matters can ripple into ceremonial life for a modern royal household.

Give your feedback

Be the first to rate this post
or leave a detailed review



Paris Joaillerie is an independent media. Support us by adding us to your Google News favorites:

Post a comment

Publish a comment