Show summary Hide summary
Art Garfunkel says he is seriously considering leaving the United States, citing anger over the current administration and growing concern about climate change. In a wide-ranging conversation with The Guardian, the singer framed his unhappiness around policy rollbacks and what he sees as alarming foreign‑policy moves.
Why Garfunkel is talking about exile
Garfunkel told The Guardian he feels alienated by recent decisions in Washington. He pointed to environmental rollbacks and cuts to international aid as deep causes for alarm. He also criticized the administration’s approach to foreign crises.
Kris Jenner’s fall boots: the quiet-luxury must-have this season
Love is Blind season 11 reunion: Morrey Eglin claps back after clash with John Shannon
While he did not announce a move, he made clear he is weighing options. He said the combination of political choices and global warming is pushing him to reconsider staying in America.
Artists stepping into politics: a wave of responses
Garfunkel joins a long list of entertainers who have publicly criticized the president. Many performers have used interviews, op‑eds and social posts to voice concern.
- Some offered reflective guidance, like Bob Dylan.
- Others were blunt. Robert De Niro told The New York Times he believes advice won’t reach the president.
- Gloria Steinem’s short, sharp message was a call for resignation.
- Even figures once aligned with the administration, such as Kid Rock, used strong language to describe the situation.
Garfunkel also contributed to a New York Times feature in which public figures gave birthday advice to the president. The collection ranged from thoughtful essays to curt barbs.
Allegations of intervention: Trump, Live Nation and the DOJ
Recent reporting by the Wall Street Journal raised questions about presidential involvement in a high‑profile antitrust case.
- According to reporting, Trump met Live Nation CEO Michael Rapino in the Oval Office on February 27.
- Sources say the meeting touched on the Kennedy Center and unresolved legal issues tied to Live Nation.
- Soon after, the Department of Justice reportedly moved toward a settlement effort.
- In April, a jury still found Live Nation violated antitrust laws.
Live Nation has not publicly detailed the Oval Office meeting. A White House spokesperson told Rolling Stone the administration is restoring law and order and denied politicizing the DOJ.
Timeline of the Live Nation story
- March: Live Nation faces federal antitrust trial.
- Late February: Reported Oval Office meeting with Rapino.
- Weeks later: Reports of presidential pressure on the DOJ to reach a deal.
- April: Jury finds Live Nation liable.
Climate, hunger and foreign policy: what concerned Garfunkel most
Garfunkel framed his criticism around three intertwined issues.
- Climate change: He warned about rising temperatures and sea levels.
- Humanitarian aid: He deplored cuts to food assistance programs.
- Foreign interventions: He questioned recent actions toward Venezuela and other crises.
He expressed faith that no administration is permanent and urged hope for political change. “We have to keep faith that leaders can be changed,” he said in other words during the talk.
How musicians and actors are shaping public debate
The exchange of opinions from cultural figures adds momentum to political conversations. Music and film stars bring attention to policy topics that might otherwise get less coverage.
Some entries are artistic, others are combative. The mix shows how celebrity views now travel quickly across outlets like The Guardian, The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and Rolling Stone.
Notable moments from public interventions
- Artists’ statements can shift public focus to climate and humanitarian policy.
- High‑profile meetings between executives and the president raise questions about influence.
- Short, forceful comments from veterans of the culture wars often make headlines.
